Ditson v. Randall
33 Me. 202
This text of 33 Me. 202 (Ditson v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ditson v. Randall, 33 Me. 202 (Me. 1851).
Opinion
We cannot assume that the horse was put away feloniously. We are at liberty only, to conclude from the statement of facts, that it was done fraudulently. And the doctrine is, that the vendor of a chattel, though the sale was procured by the fraudulent conduct of the vendee, cannot reclaim the property from a subsequent innocent purchaser.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fourth National Bank v. St. Louis Cotton Compress Co.
11 Mo. App. 333 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 Me. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ditson-v-randall-me-1851.