Ditmore v. Lochner
711 N.W.2d 303, 474 Mich. 1068
This text of 711 N.W.2d 303 (Ditmore v. Lochner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ditmore v. Lochner, 711 N.W.2d 303, 474 Mich. 1068 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Kevin DITMORE and Melanie Ditmore, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Lesly W. LOCHNER, a/k/a Lesly W. Racine, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry Michalik, Becky Michalik, Ron Hiveley, Glena Hiveley, Ray A. Busik, Phyllis J. Busik, Dale Herring, Lucinda Herring, and Floyd D. Campbell, Third-Party Defendants, and
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant/Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Grant v. AAA MICHIGAN, WISCONSIN, INC.
711 N.W.2d 303 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 303, 474 Mich. 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ditmore-v-lochner-mich-2006.