Ditman v. Buist

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ditman v. Buist

17 A. 504, 125 Pa. 609, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 758

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 22, 1889

DocketNos. 199, 200

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A. 504 (Ditman v. Buist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ditman v. Buist, 17 A. 504, 125 Pa. 609, 1889 Pa. LEXIS 758 (Pa. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

DITMAN Y. BUIST.

Per Curiam:

We find no error in the charge of the court below as embraced in the specifications of error. If, as the jury have found, the printing was done under a contract between the garnishee [611]*611and the sheriff, whilst Dickson’s establishment was in the possession of the sheriff under an execution, there was no contract between Buist and Dickson, there was nothing due from the former to the latter, and there was nothing to attach in the hands of Buist. The case does not need elaboration.

Judgment affirmed.

DITMAN Y. PUBLISHING CO.

Per Cuiji am :

This case is ruled by Ditman v. Buist, garnishee, just decided.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI