Ditkoff v. Prudential Savings Bank
This text of 245 A.D. 748 (Ditkoff v. Prudential Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order granting a motion for summary judgment in an action brought to recover the amount of a deposit in the name of plaintiff’s brother in trust for plaintiff. Plaintiff’s brother having died, the administrators of his estate make claim for this deposit. In so far as the affidavit of plaintiff states the facts and circumstances of transactions with the decedent, they may not be considered. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 347.) The pleadings and affidavits show there are circumstances concerning the deposit and the maintenance thereof which require a trial for a determination as to whether or not these facts and circumstances will overcome the presumption of fact, the depositor having died, that an absolute trust had been created. (Matter of Totten, 179 N. Y. 112; Morris v. Sheehan, 234 id. 366.) Order granting summary judgment and judgment entered thereon reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment denied, with ten dollars costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 A.D. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ditkoff-v-prudential-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1935.