Ditfurth v. Coral Gables Corp.

136 So. 470, 102 Fla. 671
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 136 So. 470 (Ditfurth v. Coral Gables Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ditfurth v. Coral Gables Corp., 136 So. 470, 102 Fla. 671 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The amended bill of complaint in this case was in a suit for an accounting between the parties, for the rescission of a purchase and sales contract involving certain lands, and to require the defendant, the appellee here, to refund to the complainant, the appellant here, the amount found to have been paid by the complainant to the defendant under the contract.

Special and general demurrers to the bill of complaint were sustained. The question presented here is like the controlling question presented in the ease of Homeseekers Realty Company, a corporation, vs. Mrs. D. C. Menear, filed June 9,1931, and under authority of the opinion and judgment in that case the order appealed from should be reversed. It is so ordered.

Reversed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 So. 470, 102 Fla. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ditfurth-v-coral-gables-corp-fla-1931.