District Township of Washington v. Thomas
This text of 12 N.W. 767 (District Township of Washington v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was held in District Township of Taylor v. Morton, 37 Iowa, 550, that a board of directors of a district township cannot, without consideration, discharge a debtor, unless authorized by the electors. It was not held, however, that the electors could authorize such discharge. In the case at bar they attempted to authorize the discharge, and did authorize it if they had the power; and the question presented is as to whether they had the power.
The electors of a district township can exercise such powers only as are conferred by statute, either expressly or by reasonable'implication. The statute relied upon in this case is section 1717 of the Code, which provides that the electors shall have the power “to direct the sale or other disposition to be made of any school-house or the site thereof, and of such other property, personal or real, as may belong to the district.” It is insisted that the power to authorize the discharge of.the defendant is included in the power to direct the disposition of the property of the district township. But, in our opinion, the discharge of a debtor- without consideration, is not the disposition of property within the meaning of the statute. The demurrer, we think, was properly sustained and the judgment must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 N.W. 767, 59 Iowa 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-township-of-washington-v-thomas-iowa-1882.