District of Columbia v. Wolfire

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in District of Columbia v. Wolfire. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 F. Supp. 3d 89
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 16, 2014·No. Civil Action No. 2012-1527·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) District of Columbia, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-01527 (ABJ) ) Doug Wolfire, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER

On September 6, 2013, Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson issued a Report and

Recommendation [Dkt. # 20] with respect to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [Dkt.

# 13] and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 14]. The Court has reviewed

Magistrate Judge Robinson’s report, plaintiff’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation [Dkt. # 22], and defendant’s response to plaintiff’s objections, and hereby

adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety for the reasons set forth in the

accompanying memorandum opinion.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 20] is ADOPTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 13] is

DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 14]

is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that JUDGMENT shall be entered for the defendant. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge

DATE: January 16, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District of Columbia v. Wolfire, (D.D.C. 2014).

District of Columbia v. Wolfire (District of Columbia v. Wolfire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.