District of Columbia v. Washington Gaslight Co.

D.C. Circuit

District of Columbia v. Washington Gaslight Co.

45 App. D.C. 78, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2655

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 1916

DocketNo. 2898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 App. D.C. 78 (District of Columbia v. Washington Gaslight Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

District of Columbia v. Washington Gaslight Co., 45 App. D.C. 78, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2655 (D.C. Cir. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Covington

of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, who sat with this Court in the hearing and determination of the appeal in the place of Mr. Justice Van Orsdel, delivered the opinion of the Court:

The question presented by the record is precisely the same as in the case of District of Columbia v. Georgetown Gaslight Co. ante, 63, the preceding case, and for the reasons assigned in that case the judgment is affirmed, with costs above and below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Covington

of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, who sat with this Court in the hearing and determination of the appeal in the place of Mr. Justice Van Orsdel, delivered the opinion of the Court:

The question presented by the record is precisely the same as in the case of District of Columbia v. Georgetown Gaslight Co. ante, 63, the preceding case, and for the reasons assigned in that case the judgment is affirmed, with costs above and below.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 App. D.C. 78, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-washington-gaslight-co-cadc-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack