District of Columbia v. The Brookings Institution
This text of 254 F.2d 955 (District of Columbia v. The Brookings Institution) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the District of Columbia Code, real property exempt from taxation includes “Buildings belonging to and used in carrying on the purposes and activities of” several named organizations, including the Brookings Institution. D.C.Code (1951) § 47-801a(k). Section 47-801a(r) (1) exempts from taxation “Grounds belonging to and reasonably required and actually used for the carrying on of the activities and purposes” of these organizations.
The Brookings Institution owns the house in which its President lives. He is expected to use the house for the Institution’s purposes. He does some official work there, although his office is not there. He pays no rent. We think the District of Columbia Tax Court was right in ruling that the house and its yard are not subject to tax. Many cases, including e. g. Wheaton College v. Town of Norton, 232 Mass. 141, 122 N.E. 280, give support to this view. Cf. District of Columbia v. George Washington University, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 214, 221 F.2d 87; District of Columbia v. Church of the Pilgrims, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 68, 247 F.2d 59.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 F.2d 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-the-brookings-institution-cadc-1958.