District of Columbia v. Moody

304 F.2d 943, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 67
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 21, 1962
DocketNos. 16827, 16828
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 304 F.2d 943 (District of Columbia v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District of Columbia v. Moody, 304 F.2d 943, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 67 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have before us the question, certified to us by a judge of the Municipal Court of the District of Columbia,1 whether the offense of destroying private property, in violation of D.C.Code § 22-3112 (1961), should be prosecuted by the Corporation Counsel of the District of Columbia or by the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. Inasmuch as violations of Section 22-3112 are, to quote the section as amended, presently punishable by “fine not to exceed one hundred dollars, or imprisonment not to exceed six months, or both such fine and imprisonment” (emphasis supplied), we think that by reason of D. C.Code § 23-101 prosecutions under Section 22-3112 must be conducted by the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. See United States v. Strothers, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 63, 228 F.2d 34 (1955).

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prosecution of Nicco Settles
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2019
District of Columbia v. Mark Grimes
404 F.2d 1337 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Smith v. District of Columbia
219 A.2d 842 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 F.2d 943, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-moody-cadc-1962.