District of Columbia v. Karsunky

258 F.2d 430
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 1958
DocketNos. 14209-14213
StatusPublished

This text of 258 F.2d 430 (District of Columbia v. Karsunky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District of Columbia v. Karsunky, 258 F.2d 430 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are petitions to review decisions of the District of Columbia Tax Court. Respondents, during the taxable years here involved, were engaged in the practice of engineering, either individually or as partners. The District of Columbia claimed a tax under the unincorporated business franchise tax provisions of the District of Columbia Code.1 The Tax Court entered decisions against the District of Columbia. In its opinion that court clearly, and we think correctly, stated and discussed the issues in the cases and reached the correct result. We see no need for further discussion here.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 F.2d 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-karsunky-cadc-1958.