District of Columbia v. Gregory

35 App. D.C. 271, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5890
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 10, 1910
DocketNo. 2119
StatusPublished

This text of 35 App. D.C. 271 (District of Columbia v. Gregory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District of Columbia v. Gregory, 35 App. D.C. 271, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5890 (D.C. 1910).

Opinions

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case is before us on a writ of error granted to review the judgment of the police court, quashing the information. The charge is that of engaging in a gift enterprise as defined in secs. 1176 and 1177. D. C. Her. Stat.

The case was heard at the same time with that of District of Columbia v. Kraft, which has been first decided. [Ante, 253].

The defendant in error is the representative of the Sperry & Hutchinson Company, which is the same that was involved in the case of Lansburgh v. District of Columbia, 11 App. D. C. 512. The business carried on is substantially the same as there. The only differences are that the stamps are now sold [273]*273at $3.50 per thousand to contracting merchants. They are still redeemable in articles of merchandise only when presented in books containing 990 stamps.

A single stamp is redeemable with a single “Falcon pen.” Ten or more are redeemable in cash at the rate of $1 per thousand. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company has not the so-called co-operative feature of the Economy Company, which is involved in Kraft’s Case. Receivers of its stamps are not required to become members, and pay nothing to the company to bo entitled to receive them. It will be noticed that the terms of redemption differ slightly from those of Kraft’s concern.

The fundamental question involved in each case is the same. Having discussed it fully in Kraft’s Case, it is unnecessary to do more than refer to the opinion in that case as decisive of this.

The judgment will be reversed with costs, and the cause remanded to the Police Court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion in Kraft’s Case. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 App. D.C. 271, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-gregory-dc-1910.