District of Columbia v. General Teleradio, Inc.

D.C. Circuit

District of Columbia v. General Teleradio, Inc.

230 F.2d 830, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 280, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3325

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 1, 1956

Docket19-5166

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 F.2d 830 (District of Columbia v. General Teleradio, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

District of Columbia v. General Teleradio, Inc., 230 F.2d 830, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 280, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3325 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case arose under the District of Columbia Income and Franchise Tax Act, § 47-1551 et seq., D.C.Code (1951). The statute provides that gain realized from the sale or exchange of property held by the taxpayer for more than two years is not taxable income. On July 28, 1950, the respondent. sold its radio and television station, together with the licenses for the operation thereof, and realized a net profit of more than $700,-000.00, attributable to the sale of its licenses.

As the then current station license had been issued by the Federal Communications Commission May 16, 1950, only about two months before its transfer, the assessor of the District of Columbia concluded the gain was taxable and assessed a tax accordingly.

The taxpayer appealed to the District of Columbia Tax Court, contending that the license really originated in 1946 when the Commission issued to its predecessor in title a station construction permit which carried with it the expectation that a station license would be issued thereafter and would be renewed periodically for the statutory period to which such license is limited. It argued *831 that its gain arose from the sale of that expectation and not merely from the sale of the license which was currently in effect when the sale was made. Judge Morgan of the Tax Court agreed that the asset had been held for more than two years before the sale, and for that reason cancelled the entire assessment and ordered a refund. The District of Columbia appeals. For the reasons given in Judge Morgan’s opinion, we think the decision of the Tax Court was correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case arose under the District of Columbia Income and Franchise Tax Act, § 47-1551 et seq., D.C.Code (1951). The statute provides that gain realized from the sale or exchange of property held by the taxpayer for more than two years is not taxable income. On July 28, 1950, the respondent. sold its radio and television station, together with the licenses for the operation thereof, and realized a net profit of more than $700,-000.00, attributable to the sale of its licenses.

As the then current station license had been issued by the Federal Communications Commission May 16, 1950, only about two months before its transfer, the assessor of the District of Columbia concluded the gain was taxable and assessed a tax accordingly.

The taxpayer appealed to the District of Columbia Tax Court, contending that the license really originated in 1946 when the Commission issued to its predecessor in title a station construction permit which carried with it the expectation that a station license would be issued thereafter and would be renewed periodically for the statutory period to which such license is limited. It argued *831 that its gain arose from the sale of that expectation and not merely from the sale of the license which was currently in effect when the sale was made. Judge Morgan of the Tax Court agreed that the asset had been held for more than two years before the sale, and for that reason cancelled the entire assessment and ordered a refund. The District of Columbia appeals. For the reasons given in Judge Morgan’s opinion, we think the decision of the Tax Court was correct.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 F.2d 830, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 280, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-general-teleradio-inc-cadc-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack