District of Columbia v. Donaldson

38 App. D.C. 259, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2117
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 5, 1912·No. No. 2334·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Appellee, Laura V. Donaldson, plaintiff below, secured a judgment against the District of Columbia for damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall. In her declaration she specifically charged that the accident occurred on a sidewalk where defendant had negligently left a “precipitous descent, or incline, unpaved, ungraded, and unguarded, and dangerous to persons passing” thereon. The evidence disclosed that the accident did not occur on the sidewalk, but on a path leading from the sidewalk across the parking, and temporarily used by the public during a period of snow and ice, to avoid passing over the place described in the declaration. The variance between the allegations and the proof is fatal. The motion of defendant for an instructed verdict in its favor should have been granted. The judgment is reversed with costs, and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District of Columbia v. Donaldson, 38 App. D.C. 259, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 2117 (D.C. Cir. 1912).

38 App. D.C. 259 (District of Columbia v. Donaldson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Broder v. District of Columbia
184 A.2d 741 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1962)
Covell v. District of Columbia
83 F.2d 714 (D.C. Circuit, 1936)
Parker v. Salvation Army
83 F.2d 578 (D.C. Circuit, 1936)