District of Columbia v. Bolling

4 App. D.C. 404, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3346
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 6, 1894
DocketNo. 321
StatusPublished

This text of 4 App. D.C. 404 (District of Columbia v. Bolling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District of Columbia v. Bolling, 4 App. D.C. 404, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3346 (D.C. Cir. 1894).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This appeal was argued and submitted with No. 322, The District of Columbia v. George W. Bolling and Caroline H. Bolling [ante, 397]. It is an appeal from the judgment recovered by George W. Bolling for the injuries received by him alone in the accident, while No. 322 is an appeal from the judgment for the injuries received by the wife. The questions of law are identical, and it was stipulated by the parties that this case should abide the judgment in the other. For the reasons given in the opinion in No. 322, the judgment herein must also be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 App. D.C. 404, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 3346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-bolling-cadc-1894.