District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A.

868 A.2d 858, 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 566, 2004 WL 2389750
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 19, 2004
DocketNo. 03-CV-24, 03-CV-38
StatusPublished

This text of 868 A.2d 858 (District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., 868 A.2d 858, 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 566, 2004 WL 2389750 (D.C. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed by appellants in each case, and the response [859]*859thereto, and appellees’ motion to exceed page limits of the lodged petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the responses to appellees’ petition, and the motion of Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, et al., for leave to file the lodged brief as amici curiae in support of the petition filed by appellants (District of Columbia, et al.), it is

ORDERED that the motions are granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged petition of appellees for rehearing or rehearing en banc and the lodged brief of amici curiae in support of petition. It is

FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division * that the petitions for rehearing are denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petitions for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing en banc are granted and that the judgment of April 29, 2004, is hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule these matters for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall simultaneously file new briefs on or before November 8, 2004, and shall file responsive briefs no later than November 23, 2004. Each party shall file ten copies of its briefs. These new briefs shall be specifically designed for consideration by and addressed to the en banc court and shall supersede all briefs previously filed in these appeals. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that any requests for extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and will be granted only upon a showing of good cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
868 A.2d 858, 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 566, 2004 WL 2389750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-beretta-usa-dc-2004.