District of Columbia v. Annie F. Campbell

D.C. Circuit

District of Columbia v. Annie F. Campbell

254 F.2d 357, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 20, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4017

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 1958

Docket14135_1

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 254 F.2d 357 (District of Columbia v. Annie F. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

District of Columbia v. Annie F. Campbell, 254 F.2d 357, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 20, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4017 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries. Upon a former appeal by the plaintiff, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 120, 243 F.2d 226, we ordered a new trial which culminated in a judgment for plaintiff. The sole issue in the present appeal by the defendant is whether the third section of the Snow Removal Act, D.C.Code 1951, § 7-803, shifts the responsibility for removal of snow from streets and sidewalks adjacent to Federal property from the District of Columbia to the Director of the National Park Service, in such sense as to bar a suit against the District for personal injuries. The District Court, in an opinion reported at 1957, 153 F.Supp. 730, held that it did not. We agree.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries. Upon a former appeal by the plaintiff, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 120, 243 F.2d 226, we ordered a new trial which culminated in a judgment for plaintiff. The sole issue in the present appeal by the defendant is whether the third section of the Snow Removal Act, D.C.Code 1951, § 7-803, shifts the responsibility for removal of snow from streets and sidewalks adjacent to Federal property from the District of Columbia to the Director of the National Park Service, in such sense as to bar a suit against the District for personal injuries. The District Court, in an opinion reported at 1957, 153 F.Supp. 730, held that it did not. We agree.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 F.2d 357, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 20, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-of-columbia-v-annie-f-campbell-cadc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack