District Grand Lodge Number 18 v. Wright

94 S.E. 1035, 21 Ga. App. 678, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 475
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 29, 1918·No. 8518·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. This case, upon the question of service and jurisdiction, is substantially controlled by the decision in Supreme Circle of Benevolence v. Smith, ante, 678 (94 S. E. 1034); and the assignments of error not so controlled are without merit.

[679]*679Decided January 29, 1918. Action upon life insurance policy; from Bibb superior court— Judge Mathews. February 2, 1917. Q. P. Gpree, for plaintiff in error. G. S. Garrett, contra.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict,-and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenhins, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District Grand Lodge Number 18 v. Wright, 94 S.E. 1035, 21 Ga. App. 678, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 475 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

94 S.E. 1035 (District Grand Lodge Number 18 v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Supreme Circle of Benevolence v. Smith
94 S.E. 1034 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)