District Council of Painters, No. 16 of Alameda v. Painters Union Local 127

415 F.2d 1121, 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2252
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 1969
DocketNo. 22742
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 415 F.2d 1121 (District Council of Painters, No. 16 of Alameda v. Painters Union Local 127) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District Council of Painters, No. 16 of Alameda v. Painters Union Local 127, 415 F.2d 1121, 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2252 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Appellees seek to enjoin appellants from collecting a dues increase imposed by the appellants in 1966. The District Court granted the injunction and this appeal followed.

The District Court held the dues increase to be in violation of § 101(a) (3) of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 411 (a) (3).1 The question presented on this [1122]*1122appeal is whether the 1966 increase amounted to an increase in the rate of dues over that payable by appellees on the effective date of the Act.

The opinion of the District Court appears at 278 F.Supp. 830 (N.D.Cal.1968). We agree with the District Court for the reasons there set forth that the 1966 dues increase did not comply with § 101 (a) (3) of the Act.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
415 F.2d 1121, 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-council-of-painters-no-16-of-alameda-v-painters-union-local-127-ca9-1969.