District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. v. Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 19, 2022
Docket1:22-cv-00211
StatusUnknown

This text of District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. v. Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass (District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. v. Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. v. Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 9 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, A.F.L.-C.LO., Petitioner, y No. 22-CV-0211 (RA) FUTURE SHOCK ARCHITECTURAL METALS & ORDER GLASS A/K/A FUTURE SHOCK ARCHITECTURAL METALS & GLASS CORP., Respondent.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: On January 10, 2022, Petitioner filed a complaint seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. Dkt. 1. Petitioner has not yet docketed an affidavit of service. Confirmation proceedings for arbitration awards must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). It is hereby: ORDERED that Petitioner shall file and serve any additional materials with which it intends to support its petition for confirmation by February 1, 2022. Respondent’s opposition, if any, is due on February 22, 2022. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due on March 1, 2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall serve a copy of this Order on Respondent. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 19, 2022 New York, New York □□ / J ( ———__, Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D.H. Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener
462 F.3d 95 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.- C.I.O. v. Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-council-no-9-international-union-of-painters-and-allied-trades-nysd-2022.