District Board of Trustees v. Morgan

918 So. 2d 273, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 164, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2551, 2005 WL 3429760
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 15, 2005·No. No. SC05-304·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review District Board of Trustees v. Morgan, 890 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), a decision by the Fifth District Court of Appeal certifying conflict with the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in O’Kon & Co. v. Riedel, 588 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that Morgan and O’Kon & Co. are factually distinct so that the decisions are not in conflict and may live side-by-side in the law of Florida. We therefore exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District Board of Trustees v. Morgan, 918 So. 2d 273, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 164, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2551, 2005 WL 3429760 (Fla. 2005).

918 So. 2d 273 (District Board of Trustees v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

District Bd. of Trustees v. Morgan
890 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
O'Kon and Co., Inc. v. Riedel
588 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)