District Attorney of Niagara County v. Ruben

156 A.D.2d 981, 550 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16159

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: County Court abused its discretion in ordering the release of respondent’s Grand Jury testimony to the Niagara County Attorney. The District Attorney did not present a compelling and particularized need for such disclosure (see, CPL 190.25 [4] [a]; Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County, 58 NY2d 436, 444-446; Ruggiero v Fahey, 103 AD2d 65, 70-71; Matter of Corporation Counsel of City of Buffalo [Cosgrove], 61 AD2d 32, 36). (Appeal from order of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. —release Grand Jury testimony.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

District Attorney of Niagara County v. Ruben, 156 A.D.2d 981, 550 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

156 A.D.2d 981 (District Attorney of Niagara County v. Ruben) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re District Attorney
448 N.E.2d 440 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
In re Corporation Counsel of the City of Buffalo
61 A.D.2d 32 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Ruggiero v. Fahey
103 A.D.2d 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)