District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Intervenor

353 F.2d 904, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 366, 60 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2470, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3923
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 1965
Docket19317
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 353 F.2d 904 (District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Intervenor, 353 F.2d 904, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 366, 60 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2470, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3923 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to charges filed by the petitioner, the General Counsel of the respondent issued a complaint charging Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. had violated Sections 8(a) (1), (2) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 1 by discharging and threatening certain chief engineers and assistant engineers. After a hearing, the trial examiner found the assistant engineers were employees subject to the Act and *905 that, with respect to them, the Company had violated the enumerated sections. The Board reversed and dismissed the complaint, holding both chief and assistant engineers were supervisors within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act and, therefore, were not employees as defined in Section 2(3).

It is agreed by the parties, and we concur, that if the Board correctly concluded the chief and assistant engineers were supervisors and not employees within the meaning of the Act, its action must be upheld. We hold there is substantial evidence in the record, considered as a whole, to support the Board’s findings.

Affirmed.

1

. 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aiello v. Apex Marine Corp.
610 F. Supp. 1255 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
353 F.2d 904, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 366, 60 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2470, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-2-marine-engineers-beneficial-association-afl-cio-v-national-cadc-1965.