District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Intervenor
This text of 353 F.2d 904 (District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to charges filed by the petitioner, the General Counsel of the respondent issued a complaint charging Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. had violated Sections 8(a) (1), (2) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 1 by discharging and threatening certain chief engineers and assistant engineers. After a hearing, the trial examiner found the assistant engineers were employees subject to the Act and *905 that, with respect to them, the Company had violated the enumerated sections. The Board reversed and dismissed the complaint, holding both chief and assistant engineers were supervisors within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act and, therefore, were not employees as defined in Section 2(3).
It is agreed by the parties, and we concur, that if the Board correctly concluded the chief and assistant engineers were supervisors and not employees within the meaning of the Act, its action must be upheld. We hold there is substantial evidence in the record, considered as a whole, to support the Board’s findings.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 F.2d 904, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 366, 60 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2470, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-2-marine-engineers-beneficial-association-afl-cio-v-national-cadc-1965.