District 1199 Natlional Union of Hospital v. State Division of Human Rights

58 A.D.2d 793, 396 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12951, 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 929
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 14, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 A.D.2d 793 (District 1199 Natlional Union of Hospital v. State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
District 1199 Natlional Union of Hospital v. State Division of Human Rights, 58 A.D.2d 793, 396 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12951, 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Motion to annul order of respondent Human Rights Appeal Board, made on or about February 18, 1977, affirming order of respondent Commissioner of Human Rights, made on or about January 20, 1976, granted to the extent only of unanimously modifying those orders, on the law, to deduct from the award of back pay to be paid to complainant Shirlee Evans by petitioner the amounts received by her as unemployment insurance, and otherwise to confirm the orders, without costs and without disbursements. Cross motion by respondent board for enforcement of the order of January 20, 1976, unanimously granted to the same extent, without costs and without disbursements. There was substantial evidence on the part of the claimant and respondent to justify the orders under review, and petitioner made not the slightest effort to produce evidence to the contrary, i.e. that the claimant’s physical condition was such as to render her unfit to hold the position from which she had been ousted. Petitioner’s claim that claimant’s award of back pay is unjustified because she could have accepted the inferior position offered to her is entirely without merit (see Milage v Woodward, 186 NY 252); however, the amount of unemployment insurance received by her is properly deductible (cf. Coyne v Campbell, 11 NY2d 372). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Evans and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiss v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board
102 A.D.2d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Rutzen v. Monroe County Long Term Care Program, Inc.
104 Misc. 2d 1000 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 A.D.2d 793, 396 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12951, 39 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/district-1199-natlional-union-of-hospital-v-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-1977.