Distinguished Motorsports, LLC v. Tom Murphy, Brent Devere, and Gary Zygmont

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 17, 2025
Docket03-25-00400-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Distinguished Motorsports, LLC v. Tom Murphy, Brent Devere, and Gary Zygmont (Distinguished Motorsports, LLC v. Tom Murphy, Brent Devere, and Gary Zygmont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Distinguished Motorsports, LLC v. Tom Murphy, Brent Devere, and Gary Zygmont, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00400-CV

Distinguished Motorsports, LLC, Appellant

v.

Tom Murphy, Brent Devere, and Gary Zygmont, Appellees

FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-24-010047, THE HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 25,

2025. On September 30, 2025, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to

its failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit

a status report regarding this appeal by October 10, 2025. Further, the notice advised appellant

that its failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want

of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this

Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to

pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established

that it is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________ Karin Crump, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: October 17, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Distinguished Motorsports, LLC v. Tom Murphy, Brent Devere, and Gary Zygmont, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/distinguished-motorsports-llc-v-tom-murphy-brent-devere-and-gary-texapp-2025.