Distillers Agents, Inc. v. Pershan

146 Misc. 378, 262 N.Y.S. 112, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1471
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 1, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 146 Misc. 378 (Distillers Agents, Inc. v. Pershan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Distillers Agents, Inc. v. Pershan, 146 Misc. 378, 262 N.Y.S. 112, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1471 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial court erred in admitting into evidence the carrier’s receipt for the goods, signed by one purporting to be the defendant’s agent, without proof as to his identity and his authority to represent the defendant. (Gieger v. Levin, 110 N. Y. Supp. 203.) Moreover, the permittee’s report filed in the Bureau of Industrial Alcohol was inadmissible without proof that the signature thereon was the defendant’s.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gieger v. Levin
110 N.Y.S. 203 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 Misc. 378, 262 N.Y.S. 112, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/distillers-agents-inc-v-pershan-nyappterm-1933.