DiStefano v. Milardo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

DiStefano v. Milardo

853 A.2d 524, 270 Conn. 908, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 315

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 30, 2004

DocketSC 17221

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 853 A.2d 524 (DiStefano v. Milardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DiStefano v. Milardo, 853 A.2d 524, 270 Conn. 908, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 315 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn. App. 838 (AC 23368), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court properly had instructed the jury that no attorney-client relationship existed between the named defendant, Joseph E. Milardo, Jr., and Lawrence J. DiStefano?”

*909 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17221. Decided June 30, 2004 Lawrence S. Dressier, in support of the petition. Michael C. Conroy, in opposition.

VERTEFEUILLE, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI