Dismukes v. State
299 So. 2d 133
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 1974·No. No. 74-402·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
It appearing that the appellant is unable to secure a transcript of the trial testimony from the official court reporter, and that counsel for the respective parties have indicated that after diligent effort they are unable to reconstruct the record, which fact is attested to by the trial judge, it is therefore
Ordered and adjudged that the final judgment of conviction and sentence herd under review be and the same is hereby set aside, and the appellant is remanded to the trial court for the purposes of being accorded a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dismukes v. State, 299 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).
299 So. 2d 133 (Dismukes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roper v. State
341 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Jackson v. State
308 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)