Dismukes v. State

299 So. 2d 133
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 27, 1974
DocketNo. 74-402
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 299 So. 2d 133 (Dismukes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dismukes v. State, 299 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the appellant is unable to secure a transcript of the trial testimony from the official court reporter, and that counsel for the respective parties have indicated that after diligent effort they are unable to reconstruct the record, which fact is attested to by the trial judge, it is therefore

Ordered and adjudged that the final judgment of conviction and sentence herd under review be and the same is hereby set aside, and the appellant is remanded to the trial court for the purposes of being accorded a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roper v. State
341 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Jackson v. State
308 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 So. 2d 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dismukes-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.