Dismukes v. Bainbridge State Bank
25 S.E. 181, 99 Ga. 179
Opinion
The bill of exceptions containing no assignment of error upon any ruling or decision of the court below, it presents nothing for adjudication by this court, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Writ'of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dismukes v. Bainbridge State Bank, 25 S.E. 181, 99 Ga. 179 (Ga. 1896).
25 S.E. 181 (Dismukes v. Bainbridge State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kimbell v. Moreland
45 S.E.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Green v. Patterson
103 S.E. 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Ocean Steamship Co. v. Blumberg & Sons
86 S.E. 1070 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Winn v. State
53 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Citizens Banking Co. v. Paris
46 S.E. 638 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)