Dismukes v. Bainbridge State Bank

25 S.E. 181, 99 Ga. 179
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 181 (Dismukes v. Bainbridge State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dismukes v. Bainbridge State Bank, 25 S.E. 181, 99 Ga. 179 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

The bill of exceptions containing no assignment of error upon any ruling or decision of the court below, it presents nothing for adjudication by this court, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Writ'of error dismissed.

D. A. Russell, for plaintiffs in error. Dorvalson & Eaioes, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kimbell v. Moreland
45 S.E.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Green v. Patterson
103 S.E. 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Ocean Steamship Co. v. Blumberg & Sons
86 S.E. 1070 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Winn v. State
53 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Citizens Banking Co. v. Paris
46 S.E. 638 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 181, 99 Ga. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dismukes-v-bainbridge-state-bank-ga-1896.