Dismucke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dismucke v. State

350 So. 2d 106

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 16, 1977·No. No. CC-482·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the records, briefs and arguments of the parties we conclude that no reversible error occurred. Moreover we deem that if error occurred by the admission into evidence of telephone company records as to certain calls made by state witness Beal, the error was only harmless. See Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1974), cert. denied, Fla., 314 So.2d 585.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the records, briefs and arguments of the parties we conclude that no reversible error occurred. Moreover we deem that if error occurred by the admission into evidence of telephone company records as to certain calls made by state witness Beal, the error was only harmless. See Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1974), cert. denied, Fla., 314 So.2d 585.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Dismucke v. State, 350 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

350 So. 2d 106 (Dismucke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related