Dismucke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dismucke v. State

350 So. 2d 106

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 16, 1977

DocketNo. CC-482

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 350 So. 2d 106 (Dismucke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dismucke v. State, 350 So. 2d 106 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the records, briefs and arguments of the parties we conclude that no reversible error occurred. Moreover we deem that if error occurred by the admission into evidence of telephone company records as to certain calls made by state witness Beal, the error was only harmless. See Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1974), cert. denied, Fla., 314 So.2d 585.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the records, briefs and arguments of the parties we conclude that no reversible error occurred. Moreover we deem that if error occurred by the admission into evidence of telephone company records as to certain calls made by state witness Beal, the error was only harmless. See Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1974), cert. denied, Fla., 314 So.2d 585.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 So. 2d 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dismucke-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack