Disman v. Securities & Exchange Commission
This text of 147 F.2d 679 (Disman v. Securities & Exchange Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Acting pursuant to section 11(e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 803, 822, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79k (e), Southern Colorado Power Company, an operating utility corporation, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission an application for approval of a proposed plan of reorganization. After the plan was modified in certain respects, the Commission approved it. As authorized by the statute, supra, the Commission applied to the United States Court for Colorado for an order to enforce and carry out such plan. After notice and hearing, the court entered an order of enforcement, and a dissatisfied owner of preferred stock of the company appealed.
On the authority of Otis & Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, - U.S. -, 65 S.Ct. 483, the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 F.2d 679, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 4429, 1945 WL 58002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disman-v-securities-exchange-commission-ca10-1945.