Dishon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dishon v. State

1912 OK CR 448, 126 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 405

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 14, 1912·No. No. A-1136.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried at the January, 1911, term of the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and was adjudged to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. At the trial Ben Eord was jointly charged with Dishon, and the appeal was originally perfected by both parties. Eater Ford withdrew his appeal and the ease was submitted as to Dishon. We have carefully considered the record and briefs of both parties, and are of the opinion that substantial justice requires that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried at the January, 1911, term of the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and was adjudged to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. At the trial Ben Eord was jointly charged with Dishon, and the appeal was originally perfected by both parties. Eater Ford withdrew his appeal and the ease was submitted as to Dishon. We have carefully considered the record and briefs of both parties, and are of the opinion that substantial justice requires that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The judgment is affirmed.

Dishon v. State, 1912 OK CR 448, 126 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 405 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 448 (Dishon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.