Dishon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Dishon v. State

1912 OK CR 448, 126 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 405

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 14, 1912

DocketNo. A-1136.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 448 (Dishon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dishon v. State, 1912 OK CR 448, 126 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 405 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried at the January, 1911, term of the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and was adjudged to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. At the trial Ben Eord was jointly charged with Dishon, and the appeal was originally perfected by both parties. Eater Ford withdrew his appeal and the ease was submitted as to Dishon. We have carefully considered the record and briefs of both parties, and are of the opinion that substantial justice requires that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was tried at the January, 1911, term of the county court of Caddo county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and was adjudged to pay a fine of two hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. At the trial Ben Eord was jointly charged with Dishon, and the appeal was originally perfected by both parties. Eater Ford withdrew his appeal and the ease was submitted as to Dishon. We have carefully considered the record and briefs of both parties, and are of the opinion that substantial justice requires that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 448, 126 P. 1135, 8 Okla. Crim. 727, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dishon-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.