Dishmond v. International Paper Company
This text of Dishmond v. International Paper Company (Dishmond v. International Paper Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. However, upon detailed reconsideration of the evidence, the Full Commission reaches the same conclusions as those reached by the Deputy Commissioner, with minor modifications. The Full Commission has determined that there are no good grounds in this case to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, as sufficient convincing evidence exists in the record to support the findings of fact, conclusions of law and ultimate award.
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as a matter of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing as:
2. Defendant was a duly qualified self-insured, with Helmsman Management Services, Inc., as servicing agent.
3. An employee-employer relationship existed between the parties at all relevant times.
4. Plaintiff sustained an admittedly compensable injury on September 20, 1993, for which the parties entered into an Agreement for Compensation, Form 21, and pursuant to which plaintiff has received benefits since September 20, 1993.
5. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $574.79, which yields a compensation rate of $383.21 per week.
6. The issue for determination before the Deputy Commissioner was whether plaintiff is entitled to benefits under N.C. GEN. STAT. §§
7. The parties stipulated medical reports into the record:
a. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 1 — one page;
b. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 2 — fifteen pages;
c. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 7 — five pages;
d. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 8 — four pages;
e. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 9 — three pages;
f. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 10 — three pages;
g. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 11 — four pages;
h. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 12 — one page;
i. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 13 — two pages;
j. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 14 — one page;
k. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 15 — one page;
l. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 16 — one page;
m. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 17 — one page;
n. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 18 — one page;
o. Plaintiff's Stipulated Exhibit No. 19 — one page;
p. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. M-1 — twenty-one pages;
q. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. M-2 — one hundred twenty-seven pages;
r. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. M-3 — fourteen pages;
s. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. M-5 — six pages;
t. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. M-6 — twenty-one pages;
u. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. M-7 — nineteen pages;
v. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. M-8 — five pages;
x. Charles L. Branch M.D. — twenty-three pages;
y. Charlotte Institute of Rehab — one hundred twenty-nine pages;
z. Timothy G. Saunders M.D. — nineteen pages;
aa. Cecile Naylor, M.C. — twelve pages;
bb. Wake Forest Department of Psychiatry — sixteen pages;
cc. Douglas Eiseley, M.D. — nineteen pages;
dd. Donald Ambler, M.D. — three pages;
ee. James Foushee, M.D. — five pages;
ff. Outpatient Psychiatry — twelve pages.
2. As a result of the admittedly compensable injury, plaintiff has sustained a twenty-six percent (26%) loss of hearing to the right ear, a sixty percent (60%) loss of vision in the left eye, and damage to his brain.
3. Plaintiff is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the injuries to his brain, vision and hearing.
2. Plaintiff is not entitled to compensation for an impairment rating pursuant to section
3. Plaintiff is entitled to have the defendant pay for medical expenses incurred, or to be incurred, as a result of the compensable injury as may be required to provide relief, effect a cure or lessen the period of disability. N.C. GEN. STAT. §
4. Plaintiff did not prosecute this appeal without reasonable ground. N.C. Gen. Stat. §
2. A reasonable attorney's fee of twenty-five percent of the compensation awarded to plaintiff in paragraph 1 above is hereby approved to be deducted from sums due plaintiff and paid directly to counsel. With respect to future benefits, counsel shall continue to receive every fourth check.
3. Defendant shall pay medical expenses incurred or to be incurred when bills for the same have been approved, in accordance with the provisions of the Act.
4. Defendant shall pay the costs of this action.
5. Defendant's request for attorney's fees is denied.
S/_____________ RENEE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/_____________ J. HOWARD BUNN, JR. CHAIRMAN
S/_____________ LAURA K. MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dishmond v. International Paper Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dishmond-v-international-paper-company-ncworkcompcom-1998.