Disharoon v. Eskew
This text of 127 S.E. 271 (Disharoon v. Eskew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition as amended is not subject to demurrer on the ground that (a) it is duplicitous; or that (b) the agent alleged to have perpetrated the fraud upon plaintiff was “a mere special agent,” or that (e) the allegations of the petition are not sufficient to support the charge of fraud. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition. See, as to declarations of a “special agent,” Williams v. Kelsey, 6 Ga. 365, 373. As to allegations of fraud in shortage of land, Leyden v. Hickman, 75 Ga. 684; Seymore v. Rice, 94 Ga. 183 (21 S. E. 293). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 S.E. 271, 160 Ga. 102, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disharoon-v-eskew-ga-1925.