Disharoon v. Eskew

127 S.E. 271, 160 Ga. 102, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 93
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 11, 1925·No. No. 4461·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

The petition as amended is not subject to demurrer on the ground that (a) it is duplicitous; or that (b) the agent alleged to have perpetrated the fraud upon plaintiff was “a mere special agent,” or that (e) the allegations of the petition are not sufficient to support the charge of fraud. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition. See, as to declarations of a “special agent,” Williams v. Kelsey, 6 Ga. 365, 373. As to allegations of fraud in shortage of land, Leyden v. Hickman, 75 Ga. 684; Seymore v. Rice, 94 Ga. 183 (21 S. E. 293). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Paul Donehoo, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disharoon v. Eskew, 127 S.E. 271, 160 Ga. 102, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 93 (Ga. 1925).

127 S.E. 271 (Disharoon v. Eskew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Fulford
127 S.E. 812 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)