Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

21 Misc. 790, 47 N.Y.S. 1134

DecidedOctober 15, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Misc. 790 (Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dise v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 21 Misc. 790, 47 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is a preponderance of evidence in plaintiff’s favor, proving that the injuries complained of were caused him, by reason of defendant’s negligence, and that he was not giiilty of contributory negligence.

The verdict of the jury in so finding must be sustained. No error, in- our opinion, was committed upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is a preponderance of evidence in plaintiff’s favor, proving that the injuries complained of were caused him, by reason of defendant’s negligence, and that he was not giiilty of contributory negligence.

The verdict of the jury in so finding must be sustained. No error, in- our opinion, was committed upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Misc. 790, 47 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dise-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nynyccityct-1897.