Discovery House, Inc. v. Consolidated City
This text of 60 F. App'x 632 (Discovery House, Inc. v. Consolidated City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On February 13, 2003, the plaintiff-appellee filed a petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. An answer was filed on March 13, 2003. All the judges on the original panel have voted to [633]*633deny a rehearing, and none of the judges in active service have requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are therefore DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F. App'x 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/discovery-house-inc-v-consolidated-city-ca7-2003.