Discover Bank v.Adams
This text of Discover Bank v.Adams (Discover Bank v.Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0005864 14-APR-2014 10:59 AM
SCWC-13-0005864
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DISCOVER BANK, a Delaware Corporation, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
BRADFORD W. ADAMS and EI RAYNA K. ADAMS, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0005864; CIV. NO. 1RC09-1-009133)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ochiai, assigned by reason of vacancy) The application for writ of certiorari, filed on March
25, 2014, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 14, 2014.
Bradford W. Adams and Ei Rayna /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald K. Adams, petitioners pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Dean E. Ochiai
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Discover Bank v.Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/discover-bank-vadams-haw-2014.