Discover Bank v. Bruckman

2018 Ohio 2449
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 25, 2018
Docket2018-A-0040
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 Ohio 2449 (Discover Bank v. Bruckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Discover Bank v. Bruckman, 2018 Ohio 2449 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

[Cite as Discover Bank v. Bruckman, 2018-Ohio-2449.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO

DISCOVER BANK, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2018-A-0040 - vs - :

NICOLE BRUCKMAN, :

Defendant-Appellant. :

Civil Appeal from the Ashtabula Municipal Court, Case No. 2017 CVF 00151.

Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

David A. Head, Weltman Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA, 323 West Cleveland Avenue, Suite 200, Cleveland, OH 44101 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Mark A. Kaiser, P.O. Box 702, Geneva, OH 44041 (For Defendant-Appellant).

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.

{¶1} Appellant, Nicole Bruckman, through counsel, filed an appeal from an

entry of the Ashtabula Municipal Court.

{¶2} App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for

filing a valid appeal is to file it within the time allowed by App.R. 4. The Supreme Court

of Ohio has held that the failure to comply with the time requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a

jurisdictional defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re H.F., 120 Ohio St.3d 499, 2008-

Ohio-6810, ¶ 17, citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams Cty. Bd. of Elections, 40 Ohio

St.3d 58, 60 (1988). {¶3} “Subject to the provisions of App.R. 4(A)(3), a party who wishes to appeal

from an order that is final upon its entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R.

3 within 30 days of that entry.” See App.R. 4(A)(1). Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of

courts to serve the parties with notice of the entry within three days of entering the

judgment upon the journal. If Civ.R. 58(B) service does not occur within three days, the

time to appeal does not begin to run until service is made and noted in the appearance

docket. Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 163 Ohio App.3d 659, 664, 2005-Ohio-5360.

{¶4} Here, the record shows the trial court issued its entry on March 26, 2018.

On that same date, the clerk of courts noted on the appearance docket that copies of

that order were mailed to the parties. Since service was made on appellant within the

three-day period required in Civ.R. 58(B), the thirty-day time period began to run on the

date of entry of judgment, i.e. March 26, 2018. The deadline for appellant to file an of

appeal was April 25, 2018, which was not a holiday or a weekend. Accordingly,

appellant’s April 27, 2018 notice of appeal was untimely.

{¶5} This court is not empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases.

Pendell, supra, at 60; see also App.R. 14(B).

{¶6} Based upon the foregoing, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed

pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1).

DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., concurs,

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., concurs in judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re H.F.
2008 Ohio 6810 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Coles v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.
839 N.E.2d 982 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams County Board of Elections
531 N.E.2d 713 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 Ohio 2449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/discover-bank-v-bruckman-ohioctapp-2018.