Discover Bank v. Adams
This text of Discover Bank v. Adams (Discover Bank v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000429 05-SEP-2013 10:29 AM
SCWC-13-0000429
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
DISCOVER BANK, a Delaware Corporation, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
BRADFORD W. ADAMS and EI RAYNA K. ADAMS, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000429; CIV. NO. 1RC09-1-009133)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
The application for writ of certiorari, filed on August
20, 2013, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 5, 2013.
Bradford W. Adams and /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Ei Rayna K. Adams, petitioners pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Discover Bank v. Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/discover-bank-v-adams-haw-2013.