Discon v. Saray, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Discon v. Saray, Inc.

273 So. 2d 299, 1973 La. LEXIS 5622

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 1, 1973·No. No. 53200·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re: Ray Lamastus applying for writ of prohibition, certiorari or mandamus. 272 So.2d 439.

Writ refused. There has been no application for a rehearing and the judgment is not final.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the application should not be considered. There was no application for rehearing of the judgment of the Court of Appeal. BARHAM, J., concurs in the denial. The judgment is not final. TATE, J., concurs in the denial. The Court of Appeal is correct. DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct. CALOGERO, J., recused, took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Ray Lamastus applying for writ of prohibition, certiorari or mandamus. 272 So.2d 439.

Writ refused. There has been no application for a rehearing and the judgment is not final.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the application should not be considered. There was no application for rehearing of the judgment of the Court of Appeal. BARHAM, J., concurs in the denial. The judgment is not final. TATE, J., concurs in the denial. The Court of Appeal is correct. DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct. CALOGERO, J., recused, took no part.

Discon v. Saray, Inc., 273 So. 2d 299, 1973 La. LEXIS 5622 (La. 1973).

Pincite

273 So. 2d 299 (Discon v. Saray, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related