Disco 95, Inc. v. Calderone

427 So. 2d 1084, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20203
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1983·No. No. AL-325·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The employee/carrier, having voluntarily dismissed their appeal, leave before us claimant’s cross-appeal challenging the constitutionality of Section 440.15(3). This statutory provision has been considered by the court in Carr v. Central Florida Aluminum Products, Inc., 402 So.2d 565 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), Acton v. Ft. Lauderdale Hospital, 418 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), Mahoney v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 419 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) and Alfred John v. GDG Seryices, Inc., 424 So.2d 114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) and in each case has withstood the attack. Accordingly, the cross-appeal is denied.

NIMMONS, J., concurs. BOOTH, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disco 95, Inc. v. Calderone, 427 So. 2d 1084, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20203 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

427 So. 2d 1084 (Disco 95, Inc. v. Calderone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houghton v. ABJ Constructors, Inc.
433 So. 2d 47 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)