Disciplinary Counsel v. Young

924 N.E.2d 846, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1544
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 2010
Docket2003-1865 and 2006-1261
StatusPublished

This text of 924 N.E.2d 846 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Counsel v. Young, 924 N.E.2d 846, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1544 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

This cause is pending before the court upon consideration of respondent’s petition for reinstatement. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion for redaction,

It is ordered that the motion is granted, and counsel for respondent shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, from the attachments to respondent’s petition for reinstatement filed in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
924 N.E.2d 846, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-young-ohio-2010.