Disciplinary Counsel v. Young
This text of 924 N.E.2d 846 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is pending before the court upon consideration of respondent’s petition for reinstatement. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion for redaction,
It is ordered that the motion is granted, and counsel for respondent shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio and redact all personal identifiers, as defined by Rule 44(H) of the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio, from the attachments to respondent’s petition for reinstatement filed in this case within ten days of the date of this entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
924 N.E.2d 846, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-young-ohio-2010.