Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams
This text of 2017 Ohio 920 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Orlando Joseph Williams, Attorney Registration No. 0033558, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.
{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 8, 2016, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years with 18 months stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).
{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21) and consistent with the opinion rendered herein on March 8, 2016, respondent shall serve 18 months of monitored probation.
{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this order relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(A)(3). It is further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation.
{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(21). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with *1215 Gov.Bar R. V(21)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated.
{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).
{¶ 7} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams, 145 Ohio St.3d 308, 2016-Ohio-827, 49 N.E.3d 289.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 Ohio 920, 78 N.E.3d 890, 150 Ohio St. 3d 1214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-williams-ohio-2017.