Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitfield

2012 Ohio 3798, 975 N.E.2d 1018, 133 Ohio St. 3d 1201
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitfield. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Ohio St. 3d 284
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 24, 2012·No. 2011-0284 and 2011-1755·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, James Jonathan Whitfield, Attorney Registration No. 0080720, last known business address in Fairfield, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 20, 2012, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with credit for time served under the interim felony suspension imposed on May 24, 2010, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitfield, 132 Ohio St.3d 284, 2012-Ohio-2708, 971 N.E.2d 915.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitfield, 2012 Ohio 3798, 975 N.E.2d 1018, 133 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 3798 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitfield
2012 Ohio 2708 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)