Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward

2016 Ohio 734, 55 N.E.3d 1117, 146 Ohio St. 3d 1254
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 Ohio St. 3d 23
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 29, 2016·No. 2013-1979·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Richard Grove Ward, Attorney Registration No. 0037613, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.

*1255 {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of January 29, 2015, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the ■ practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

O’ConnoR, C.J., and PfeifeR, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, FRENCH, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward, 2016 Ohio 734, 55 N.E.3d 1117, 146 Ohio St. 3d 1254 (Ohio 2016).

2016 Ohio 734 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.