Disciplinary Counsel v. Travis

110 Ohio St. 3d 1263
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Travis. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 Ohio St. 3d 322
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 2006·No. No. 2003-1533·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Christopher T. Travis, Attorney Registration No. 0067699, last known address in Milford, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of March 10, 2004, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with the second year stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Travis, 101 Ohio St.3d 322, 2004-Ohio-785, 804 N.E.2d 969.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Travis, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1263 (Ohio 2006).

110 Ohio St. 3d 1263 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Travis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Travis
804 N.E.2d 969 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)