Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino

93 N.E.3d 985, 2017 Ohio 5861, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1203
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 18, 2017·No. No. 2016–0858.·Published

Opinion

*1203{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Ronnie Michael Tamburrino, Attorney Registration No. 0021594, last known address in Rock Creek, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 7, 2016, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, with the final six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

*986{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino, 151 Ohio St.3d 148, 2016-Ohio-8014, 87 N.E.3d 158.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino, 93 N.E.3d 985, 2017 Ohio 5861, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1203 (Ohio 2017).

93 N.E.3d 985 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Tamburrino (Slip Opinion)
2016 Ohio 8014 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)