Disciplinary Counsel v. Stranke

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Stranke

865 N.E.2d 52, 113 Ohio St. 3d 1254

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 12, 2007

DocketNo. 2006-0731

StatusPublished

This text of 865 N.E.2d 52 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Stranke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Stranke, 865 N.E.2d 52, 113 Ohio St. 3d 1254 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Terry Lynn Stranke, Attorney Registration No. 0043184, last known business address in Mantua, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of September 6, 2006, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Stranke, 110 Ohio St.3d 247, 2006-Ohio-4357, 852 N.E.2d 1202.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI