Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire

944 N.E.2d 237, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1435

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Ohio St. 3d 368 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 28, 2011·No. 2010-2021·Published

Opinion

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

Upon consideration of relator’s motion to strike the attachments to respondent’s answer brief, it is ordered that the motion is denied.

O’Donnell, Cdpp, and Stewart, JJ., dissent in part and would grant the motion as to Exhibit B. Melody J. Stewart, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for McGee Brown, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

Upon consideration of relator’s motion to strike the attachments to respondent’s answer brief, it is ordered that the motion is denied.

O’Donnell, Cdpp, and Stewart, JJ., dissent in part and would grant the motion as to Exhibit B. Melody J. Stewart, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for McGee Brown, J.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire, 944 N.E.2d 237, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1435 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

944 N.E.2d 237 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.