Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire

Ohio Supreme Court

Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire

932 N.E.2d 334, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1538

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 20, 2010

Docket2007-0492

StatusPublished

This text of 932 N.E.2d 334 (Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Disciplinary Counsel v. Squire, 932 N.E.2d 334, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1538 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent, Carole Hutchins Squire, of a request for extension of time to pay costs. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by this court that respondent’s request for extension of time is hereby denied. It is further ordered that this matter is referred to Office of the Attorney General for commencement of collections proceedings.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent, Carole Hutchins Squire, of a request for extension of time to pay costs. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by this court that respondent’s request for extension of time is hereby denied. It is further ordered that this matter is referred to Office of the Attorney General for commencement of collections proceedings.

Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

932 N.E.2d 334, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-counsel-v-squire-ohio-2010.